Today's Articles

  • Cape Town to Santiago on Royal Princess

    Question:

       Has anyone done the 24 day cruise between South Africa and Chile past Antarctica over Christmas?  It seems like a real bargain at under $2,000 (US) for an outside cabin with an unobstructed view. Couldn’t find an independent review of the trip. Elmer

    Response:

    We have not done the Capetown trip.   But have sailed the Royal for 14 days from Buenos Aires to Santiago. Later the same year we did a 10 day trip to Norway on the Royal.  As I remember both trips were in the $70 -$80 a day range. The Royal is an older smaller ship the we like very much.  We enjoyed both trips on her.  As you may know, the Royal is being transferred to P&O next year and will change its name. I suspect the airfare to Capetown and from Santiago may discourage some potential passengers and results in lower fares. You could also receive a $250 on board shareholders credit since the Capetown cruise is over 14 days.  See Carnival Cruise Lines Annual Report – page 7 http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nys/ccl/reports/ccl03AR.pdf —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:

    > We have not done the Capetown trip.   But have sailed the Royal for 14 days > from Buenos Aires to Santiago. Later the same year we did a 10 day trip to > Norway on the Royal.  As I remember both trips were in the $70 -$80 a day > range. > The Royal is an older smaller ship the we like very much.  We enjoyed both > trips on her.  As you may know, the Royal is being transferred to P&O next > year and will change its name. > I suspect the airfare to Capetown and from Santiago may discourage some > potential passengers and results in lower fares. > You could also receive a $250 on board shareholders credit since the > Capetown cruise is over 14 days.  See Carnival Cruise Lines Annual Report – > page 7 > http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nys/ccl/reports/ccl03AR.pdf

          Did you stop in Antarctica?  The cruise from Capetown lists Elephant Island, Esperanza Station, Sigma Island, and Deception Island as "Ports" on antarctica, but the itinerary states "scenic cruising" without an indication that they will tender to shore.    Were the seas rough around the Cape?    Thanks for the "sharholder’s tip".  That is currently worth about 5% of the cost of the required hundred shares. Elmer

    Response:

    Did not go to Anarctica.  We did go "around" the Cape.  They took us around it briefly and right back and give us a certificate that we did it.  Seas were about 10 feet which the crew said was relatively calm.  It was windy but pleasant. "Scenic cruising" means no stopping. —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:

    >Did not go to Anarctica.  We did go "around" the Cape.  They took us around >it briefly and right back and give us a certificate that we did it.  Seas >were about 10 feet which the crew said was relatively calm.  It was windy >but pleasant.

    Cape Horn?  Ten feet?  That’s smooth as glass.  A friend gave me a picture of their rounding.  A sixty foot boat in thirty foot seas.. >"Scenic cruising" means no stopping. >—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– >http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >—–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    – dillon When I was a kid, I thought the angel’s name was Hark and the horse’s name was Bob.

    Response:

       Has anyone done the 24 day cruise between South Africa and Chile past Antarctica over Christmas?  It seems like a real bargain at under $2,000 (US) for an outside cabin with an unobstructed view. Couldn’t find an independent review of the trip. Elmer

    Response:

    We have not done the Capetown trip.   But have sailed the Royal for 14 days from Buenos Aires to Santiago. Later the same year we did a 10 day trip to Norway on the Royal.  As I remember both trips were in the $70 -$80 a day range. The Royal is an older smaller ship the we like very much.  We enjoyed both trips on her.  As you may know, the Royal is being transferred to P&O next year and will change its name. I suspect the airfare to Capetown and from Santiago may discourage some potential passengers and results in lower fares. You could also receive a $250 on board shareholders credit since the Capetown cruise is over 14 days.  See Carnival Cruise Lines Annual Report – page 7 http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nys/ccl/reports/ccl03AR.pdf —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:

    > We have not done the Capetown trip.   But have sailed the Royal for 14 days > from Buenos Aires to Santiago. Later the same year we did a 10 day trip to > Norway on the Royal.  As I remember both trips were in the $70 -$80 a day > range. > The Royal is an older smaller ship the we like very much.  We enjoyed both > trips on her.  As you may know, the Royal is being transferred to P&O next > year and will change its name. > I suspect the airfare to Capetown and from Santiago may discourage some > potential passengers and results in lower fares. > You could also receive a $250 on board shareholders credit since the > Capetown cruise is over 14 days.  See Carnival Cruise Lines Annual Report – > page 7 > http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nys/ccl/reports/ccl03AR.pdf

          Did you stop in Antarctica?  The cruise from Capetown lists Elephant Island, Esperanza Station, Sigma Island, and Deception Island as "Ports" on antarctica, but the itinerary states "scenic cruising" without an indication that they will tender to shore.    Were the seas rough around the Cape?    Thanks for the "sharholder’s tip".  That is currently worth about 5% of the cost of the required hundred shares. Elmer

    Response:

    Did not go to Anarctica.  We did go "around" the Cape.  They took us around it briefly and right back and give us a certificate that we did it.  Seas were about 10 feet which the crew said was relatively calm.  It was windy but pleasant. "Scenic cruising" means no stopping. —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:

    >Did not go to Anarctica.  We did go "around" the Cape.  They took us around >it briefly and right back and give us a certificate that we did it.  Seas >were about 10 feet which the crew said was relatively calm.  It was windy >but pleasant.

    Cape Horn?  Ten feet?  That’s smooth as glass.  A friend gave me a picture of their rounding.  A sixty foot boat in thirty foot seas.. >"Scenic cruising" means no stopping. >—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– >http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >—–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    – dillon When I was a kid, I thought the angel’s name was Hark and the horse’s name was Bob.

    Response:


  • They're not worthy! They're not worthy!

    Question:

    But Alice is…go get ‘em, Cooper.  ;-) HOLLYWOOD VS. AMERICA Alice Cooper: Anti-Bush acts treasonous morons Legendary shock artist: ‘Rock should never be in bed with politics’ Posted: August 24, 2004 4:15 p.m. Eastern


  • Qantas bastards

    Question:

    Qantas’ current ads are the most expensive tv ads possible to make. They are up to 2-3 minutes long (considering the cost of advertising, that is long), feature a large cast and are set in multiple countries. I can’t imagine the cost of this advertising campaign. Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian character of the airline) to save money. They sack IT and finance staff, claiming the need to cut costs. They charge fuel levies, saying that they can’t absorb the cost of fuel prices. I CAN TELL YOU HOW TO SAVE SOME MONEY, YOU DUMB CUNTS. STOP THE 3 BILLION DOLLAR TV ADVERTS. For that money they could have installed more PTV’s on their planes. They could have charged less than $1000 more than their compeditors on flights to london. I will NEVER fly this moronic airline.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Qantas’ current ads are the most expensive tv ads possible to make. They >are up to 2-3 minutes long (considering the cost of advertising, that is >long), feature a large cast and are set in multiple countries. I can’t >imagine the cost of this advertising campaign. >Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian >character of the airline) to save money. >They sack IT and finance staff, claiming the need to cut costs. >They charge fuel levies, saying that they can’t absorb the cost of fuel >prices. >I CAN TELL YOU HOW TO SAVE SOME MONEY, YOU DUMB CUNTS. STOP THE 3 >BILLION DOLLAR TV ADVERTS. >For that money they could have installed more PTV’s on their planes. >They could have charged less than $1000 more than their compeditors on >flights to london. I will NEVER fly this moronic airline.

    Hmm I see. Out of interest, which airline will you be flying instead? –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    > Hmm I see. Out of interest, which airline will you be flying instead? > –==++AJC++==–

    You think there are no other airlines that fly from australia to london?

    Response:

    > Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian > character of the airline) to save money.

    In their defense though they did offer to relocate current staff to london. What kind of idiot wouldn’t accept a london posting? They shouldn’t be working in the industry anyway, so at least this move will weed those staff out.

    Response:

    >> Hmm I see. Out of interest, which airline will you be flying instead? > –==++AJC++==– >You think there are no other airlines that fly from australia to london?

    I know there are plenty. My question was which one will you be flying instead of Qantas? –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    >> Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian > character of the airline) to save money. > In their defense though they did offer to relocate current staff to london. > What kind of idiot wouldn’t accept a london posting?

    Someone who enjoys spending time out of doors now and then. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

    Response:

    > Someone who enjoys spending time out of doors now and then.

    What are you talking about? Looking out of the window, it’s not rained for at least ten minutes. Cheers, Howard (London)

    Response:

    >Qantas’ current ads are the most expensive tv ads possible to make. They >are up to 2-3 minutes long (considering the cost of advertising, that is >long), feature a large cast and are set in multiple countries. I can’t >imagine the cost of this advertising campaign.

    It appears from your comments below that you can, and have, *imagined* the cost of the advertising campaign. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian >character of the airline) to save money. >They sack IT and finance staff, claiming the need to cut costs. >They charge fuel levies, saying that they can’t absorb the cost of fuel >prices. >I CAN TELL YOU HOW TO SAVE SOME MONEY, YOU DUMB CUNTS. STOP THE 3 >BILLION DOLLAR TV ADVERTS. >For that money they could have installed more PTV’s on their planes. >They could have charged less than $1000 more than their compeditors on >flights to london. I will NEVER fly this moronic airline.

    Response:

    Hi Actually, QANTAS is an acronym for Queer And Nasty, Try Another Service. Regards KGB

    Response:

    >>Hi >Actually, QANTAS is an acronym for Queer And Nasty, Try Another >Service. >Nonsense, it’s Queens And Nancies Trained As Stewards.

    Since when? It’s always been Queers And Nymphomaniacs To All Stations. –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    @news.optusnet.com.au: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Qantas’ current ads are the most expensive tv ads possible to make. They > are up to 2-3 minutes long (considering the cost of advertising, that is > long), feature a large cast and are set in multiple countries. I can’t > imagine the cost of this advertising campaign. > Then they say they need to hire foreign staff (harming the australian > character of the airline) to save money. > They sack IT and finance staff, claiming the need to cut costs. > They charge fuel levies, saying that they can’t absorb the cost of fuel > prices. > I CAN TELL YOU HOW TO SAVE SOME MONEY, YOU DUMB CUNTS. STOP THE 3 > BILLION DOLLAR TV ADVERTS. > For that money they could have installed more PTV’s on their planes. > They could have charged less than $1000 more than their compeditors on > flights to london. I will NEVER fly this moronic airline.

    You mean they canned the cute Koala?

    Response:

    >>Someone who enjoys spending time out of doors now and then. > What are you talking about? Looking out of the window, it’s not rained for > at least ten minutes. > Cheers, Howard (London)

    You lucky bastards, we haven’t had rain here in five months. It’s the middle of winter and it’s 27


  • Warning about Travelocity Cancellation Fees

    Question:

    I just wanted to share my disappointment with Travelocity, and warn everyone that their cancellation fees are very strict. I had reserved a hotel for 1 night in Tampa at a Best Western in October.  The cost was about $55.  I reserved this about 2 months ago.  I booked this with Travelocity, and paid with my credit card. Then, last week I had to call Travelocity to cancel the reservation. The cancellation policy states "Bookings are subject to a $25 fee for any cancellation or change."  I was thinking though that since I was cancelling 6 weeks in advanced to the reservation date, that this could be waived.  Nope! The representative said that this was the fee for cancelling, no matter how far in advanced it was.  The only thing I could do was send an email to their "Consumer Relations" department.  I did, but have not received any response – it’s been a full week since.  I guess they don’t like to "relate" to their unhappy customers. A $25 cancellation fee on a $55 hotel night is a bit much, considering a 6 week advanced notice was given.  Outrageous! I know I will not use them again.

    Response:

    Well yes for a single night that is a high percentage. If it wasn’t a single night it would seem more fair. They don’t own the right to the reservation systems, they just pimp out to tour operators. On another note also beware of the so called cancellation insurance. Orbitz offers it and it also is thru another outside agency. It does not include canceling except for a few select reasons. Which also requires you to file a refund request to the agency. So more or less it is up to them to validate your refund. — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

    Response:

    > Then, last week I had to call Travelocity to cancel the reservation. > The cancellation policy states "Bookings are subject to a $25 fee for > any cancellation or change."  I was thinking though that since I was > cancelling 6 weeks in advanced to the reservation date, that this > could be waived.  Nope!

    I’ll never understand these posts lambasting companies for adhering to their stated terms and conditions. But anyway, the lesson here is, don’t reserve a hotel room 2 months in advance. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

    Response:

    You want a room at deep discount, then you should expect strict cancellation policies.  You want to be able to cancel the afternoon of the reservation, then you’re going to pay more.  This is how all travel reservations work, so you shouldn’t be surprised. Matt

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I just wanted to share my disappointment with Travelocity, and warn > everyone that their cancellation fees are very strict. > I had reserved a hotel for 1 night in Tampa at a Best Western in > October.  The cost was about $55.  I reserved this about 2 months ago. >  I booked this with Travelocity, and paid with my credit card. > Then, last week I had to call Travelocity to cancel the reservation. > The cancellation policy states "Bookings are subject to a $25 fee for > any cancellation or change."  I was thinking though that since I was > cancelling 6 weeks in advanced to the reservation date, that this > could be waived.  Nope! The representative said that this was the fee > for cancelling, no matter how far in advanced it was.  The only thing > I could do was send an email to their "Consumer Relations" department. >  I did, but have not received any response – it’s been a full week > since.  I guess they don’t like to "relate" to their unhappy > customers. > A $25 cancellation fee on a $55 hotel night is a bit much, considering > a 6 week advanced notice was given.  Outrageous! I know I will not use > them again.

    Response:

    Thanks for the heads up, but, I cannot imagine NOT reading the cancellation policy and if I had to cancel, I doubt I would be writing to anyone warning them of it and being upset that they actually enforced it. I cannot figure out why you are upset or disappointed.  I am sorry you had to cancel, but, I guess this will be a lesson to book with the hotel directly, most will match Travelocity’s rates and have a far more flex. policy.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I just wanted to share my disappointment with Travelocity, and warn > everyone that their cancellation fees are very strict. > I had reserved a hotel for 1 night in Tampa at a Best Western in > October.  The cost was about $55.  I reserved this about 2 months ago. >  I booked this with Travelocity, and paid with my credit card. > Then, last week I had to call Travelocity to cancel the reservation. > The cancellation policy states "Bookings are subject to a $25 fee for > any cancellation or change."  I was thinking though that since I was > cancelling 6 weeks in advanced to the reservation date, that this > could be waived.  Nope! The representative said that this was the fee > for cancelling, no matter how far in advanced it was.  The only thing > I could do was send an email to their "Consumer Relations" department. >  I did, but have not received any response – it’s been a full week > since.  I guess they don’t like to "relate" to their unhappy > customers. > A $25 cancellation fee on a $55 hotel night is a bit much, considering > a 6 week advanced notice was given.  Outrageous! I know I will not use > them again.

    Response:

    escribi


  • Ketchup with that, Fidel?

    Question:

    My, my, my – the Ketchup Bitch has certainly been spreading it around.  A rotten little tomato if ever there were one, eh? Teresa denies financing Castro’s Internet network 3 members of Congress charge Heinz Kerry with funding Cuban propaganda project Posted: August 10, 2004 11:02 p.m. Eastern


  • More orders for A380

    Question:

    > Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is > a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a > sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much > further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It > is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with > footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous > new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, > including the parallels with Changi and SQ. All three carriers however > are exploiting their geographical position, just as SQ did 30 years > ago. Even EK has only just started, and the others will follow. The > question is what will happen to GF? They really need to re-invent > themselves to compete.

    For Europeans who want to travel to the UAE on holiday, it’s worth pointing out that the UAE legal system is quite different from the one they will be familiar with: http://www.travelwizard.com/middleeast/UnitedArabEmirates_Overview.html "Persons involved in an accident in which another party is injured automatically go to jail until the injured person is released from the hospital. Should a person die in a traffic accident, the driver of the other car is liable for payment of compensation for the death (known as "dhiyya"), usually the equivalent of $41,000 (US). Even relatively minor accidents may result in lengthy proceedings, during which both drivers may be prohibited from leaving the country." There was an incident a while ago where a UK citizen on a jet ski badly injured a swimmer. The jet ski driver was jailed for quite a long time while things were sorted out. I’m not trying to put people off: Dubai is a fabulous place and well worth a visit. But it’s as well to be forewarned. — Simon Elliott    http://www.ctsn.co.uk

    Response:

    >Hints? It is reality. Emirates have created a major hub at DXB which >is already serving the Europe-Asia/Australia/NZ market, have started >to add North America, and will include South Africa and South America.

    Will include?  Last year, someone flew out to meet me on a LHR-JNB via DXB with Emirates.  She liked it even though it was a bit out of the way. Jim.

    Response:

    >>Hints? It is reality. Emirates have created a major hub at DXB which >is already serving the Europe-Asia/Australia/NZ market, have started >to add North America, and will include South Africa and South America. >Will include?  Last year, someone flew out to meet me on a LHR-JNB via >DXB with Emirates.  She liked it even though it was a bit out of the >way. >Jim.

    Good grief. It’s already started. I can’t keep up with their expansion! –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    > How is the gay life in Dubai, I wonder…

    The population is overwhelmingly male, for whatever that’s worth. > could I bring my Jewish boyfriend for a visit…???

    Yes, there is no rule preventing Jews or boyfriends from visiting Dubai. It’s actually a very nice place and I’d recommend it to almost anyone. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

    Response:

    >> Hints? It is reality. Emirates have created a major hub at DXB which > is already serving the Europe-Asia/Australia/NZ market, have started > to add North America, and will include South Africa and South America. > They are already like airlines such as Singapore, KLM, Icelandair, > where the size of the airline far outweighs the size of population of > their home country. Qatar and Etihad will do the same. > Singapore has significant O&D traffic as it is a regional financial > centre (like HKG and Tokyo in Asia, London and Frankfurt in Europe) and > has a pretty good industrial and regional HQ base too.  Middle East > doesn’t have any of that other than oil workers?

    Tourism is big and growing in Dubai (though not really elsewhere in the Gulf). Throughout the region there are huge numbers of foreign workers – not just oil workers, not by a long shot – who visit their homes in Asia as often as they can manage. On almost any flight between the Gulf and points east you’ll see that most of the passengers are blue and white-collar workers, not holidaymakers. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is >> a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a >> sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much >> further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It >> is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with >> footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous >> new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, >> including the parallels with Changi and SQ. >Does Singapore ban holders of Israeli passports and discourage Jews in >general from visiting? > No idea. I suggest you’d be better off addressing your query to an > embassy or consulate of Singapore. I haven’t heard of any problems > with Singapore, but I’m sure you are aware that New Zealand is > extremely displeased with Israel at the moment. New Zealand have just > jailed two Israeli spies, a third has fled, and apparently has been > working for the North Korean government of all things! New Zealand is > very unhappy with what they perceive to be Israel’s arrogant attitude > to the matter, they have imposed diplomatic sanctions against Israel, > but I suppose it is quite concieveable that they could impose > sanctions against ordinary Israeili citizens if things deteriorate > further. I suppose it is all part of the regular way of governments > falling in and out with one another.

    AJC you are so cute when you are being "flip"… ;-) >All this fuss about Dubai reminds me of the brouhaha about the 1936 Berlin >Olympics, e.g. "Wow, what a fabulous place!  These Germans have really got >things on the ball here!". > Well that’s far too long ago for me to have any experience of, but the > history I learned doesn’t throw up any obvious similarities.

    Maybe you should study more history…just a thought ;-) >Let’s face it: Dubai is just another Muslim shite hole.  A nicely glammed – >up shite hole, but a shite hole nonetheless. > Oh the world is full of shite holes, of all creeds and religions, > always has been, probably always will be.

    How is the gay life in Dubai, I wonder…could I bring my Jewish boyfriend for a visit…??? — Best Greg "just wonderin’…"

    Response:

    > Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be > overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, > since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s > with just business travelers.

    Pilgrimages to Mecca. Also, while it appears that they are being extremly optimistic, remember that there is a lot of money in the middle east and it is also well placed strategically to act as hubs. (but not perfect location on great circle routes).

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is > a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a > sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much > further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It > is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with > footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous > new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, > including the parallels with Changi and SQ. > Does Singapore ban holders of Israeli passports and discourage Jews in > general from visiting? > All this fuss about Dubai reminds me of the brouhaha about the 1936 Berlin > Olympics, e.g. "Wow, what a fabulous place!  These Germans have really got > things on the ball here!". > Let’s face it: Dubai is just another Muslim shite hole.  A nicely glammed – > up shite hole, but a shite hole nonetheless.

    Well, at least they’re doing something constructive with their oil riches. Most of the region is indeed a corrupt and dangerous shite hole, but if any country in the area has a chance of becoming the next Singapore it would be the UAE. They are on a spending orgy, and with the current high price of oil they can afford massive fleets and mega construction projects. I think they are doing a noble thing. I wish them well, as we all should. However… the oil bidness is very finicky. In 1981, the entire world believed that oil prices would rise forever. Prices were far higher than they are today adjusted for inflation. The Middle East was awash in cash. Then the inevitable bust hit. IIRC, the price for a barrel of crude dropped below $9. What would happen to all of their grandiose construction projects and enormous aircraft orders if the cash spigot was suddenly turned off agai n? This should be a serious concern for any company relying heavily on sales from one tiny portion of the world that receives its entire revenue from one commodity. Those who think it can’t happen again are deluding themselves.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is > a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a > sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much > further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It > is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with > footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous > new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, > including the parallels with Changi and SQ. >Does Singapore ban holders of Israeli passports and discourage Jews in >general from visiting?

    No idea. I suggest you’d be better off addressing your query to an embassy or consulate of Singapore. I haven’t heard of any problems with Singapore, but I’m sure you are aware that New Zealand is extremely displeased with Israel at the moment. New Zealand have just jailed two Israeli spies, a third has fled, and apparently has been working for the North Korean government of all things! New Zealand is very unhappy with what they perceive to be Israel’s arrogant attitude to the matter, they have imposed diplomatic sanctions against Israel, but I suppose it is quite concieveable that they could impose sanctions against ordinary Israeili citizens if things deteriorate further. I suppose it is all part of the regular way of governments falling in and out with one another. >All this fuss about Dubai reminds me of the brouhaha about the 1936 Berlin >Olympics, e.g. "Wow, what a fabulous place!  These Germans have really got >things on the ball here!".

    Well that’s far too long ago for me to have any experience of, but the history I learned doesn’t throw up any obvious similarities. >Let’s face it: Dubai is just another Muslim shite hole.  A nicely glammed – >up shite hole, but a shite hole nonetheless.

    Oh the world is full of shite holes, of all creeds and religions, always has been, probably always will be. –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    > Hints? It is reality. Emirates have created a major hub at DXB which > is already serving the Europe-Asia/Australia/NZ market, have started > to add North America, and will include South Africa and South America. > They are already like airlines such as Singapore, KLM, Icelandair, > where the size of the airline far outweighs the size of population of > their home country. Qatar and Etihad will do the same.

    Singapore has significant O&D traffic as it is a regional financial centre (like HKG and Tokyo in Asia, London and Frankfurt in Europe) and has a pretty good industrial and regional HQ base too.  Middle East doesn’t have any of that other than oil workers?

    Response:

    > July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > as much as $7 billion.

    Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s with just business travelers.

    Response:

    >July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger >aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab >Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth >as much as $7 billion. >Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be >overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, >since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s >with just business travelers.

    Don’t forget the Middle East virtually "imports" *all* of their blue collar workers and some white collar ones. The locals rarely "work" per se. There’s an enormous amount of nationals from countries like Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Philippines etc that work/live in the mid east and they all usually get a free trip home once a year as part of their contracts. With so many of them travelling over the year, there’s almost a guaranteed load factor for each flight. The mid east carriers are also now also making inroads into what the Asian carriers have been doing for years. Funnelling through and connecting traffic from the nether regions through to Europe. Another added attraction with Euro flights is the large number of senior white collar workers from there that work in the mid east as well. Don’t think of them using these craft as a to and from a Mid East port only – they fill a very big and ever growing niche peculiar to the mid east.

    Response:

    >> July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > as much as $7 billion. >Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be >overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, >since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s >with just business travelers.

    Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, including the parallels with Changi and SQ. All three carriers however are exploiting their geographical position, just as SQ did 30 years ago. Even EK has only just started, and the others will follow. The question is what will happen to GF? They really need to re-invent themselves to compete. –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    > Well in the case of Emirate’s home territory, Dubai is booming, it is > a fast growing tourist destination popular with Europeans seeking a > sun sea and sand holiday with a difference, and is set to grow much > further. Of course it is also a very popular stopover destination. It > is also developing in to a playground for the rich and famous with > footballers, pop stars and such like buying up some of the fabulous > new developments there. It is rather successfully doing a Singapore, > including the parallels with Changi and SQ.

    Does Singapore ban holders of Israeli passports and discourage Jews in general from visiting? All this fuss about Dubai reminds me of the brouhaha about the 1936 Berlin Olympics, e.g. "Wow, what a fabulous place!  These Germans have really got things on the ball here!". Let’s face it: Dubai is just another Muslim shite hole.  A nicely glammed – up shite hole, but a shite hole nonetheless. — Best Greg

    Response:

    > July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > as much as $7 billion. > Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be > overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, > since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s > with just business travelers.

    I’ve seen hints that BA, Qantas, Virgin, etc., are the ones to have worries. These hints say that the Middle-Eastern airlines buying the A380 are eyeing the Europe to Asia routes with [maybe] a tech stop at their home base.  O/D traffic to/from their base wouldn’t be their prime motive according to these stories.

    Response:

    > July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > as much as $7 billion.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3913493.stm and now Turkish, but it doesnt say which planes.

    Response:

    >> July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > as much as $7 billion. >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3913493.stm >and now Turkish, but it doesnt say which planes.

    330s and 320 family, oh and some 737s. The idea is they buy from Airbus to get in favour with Europeans to support their application to join the EU, and buy from Boeing to keep in favour with the Americans so Bush will continue saying the EU should let them join. Or am I being synical? –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger > > aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab > > Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth > > as much as $7 billion. > Am I the only who thinks all these Middle-Eastern airlines might just be > overreaching their grasp?  I mean, how much of a tourist trade is there, > since I can’t imagine all the separate carriers filling all these A380’s > with just business travelers. >I’ve seen hints that BA, Qantas, Virgin, etc., are the ones to have worries. >These hints say that the Middle-Eastern airlines buying the A380 are eyeing >the Europe to Asia routes with [maybe] a tech stop at their home base.  O/D >traffic to/from their base wouldn’t be their prime motive according to these >stories.

    Hints? It is reality. Emirates have created a major hub at DXB which is already serving the Europe-Asia/Australia/NZ market, have started to add North America, and will include South Africa and South America. They are already like airlines such as Singapore, KLM, Icelandair, where the size of the airline far outweighs the size of population of their home country. Qatar and Etihad will do the same. –==++AJC++==–

    Response:

    July 20 — Airbus SAS, the world’s largest maker of passenger aircraft, won an order from Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, for 24 planes, including four A380s, plus 12 options worth as much as $7 billion. The order from the government-owned carrier, which plans to expand its fleet to 50 planes by 2009, also includes 12 A330-200s, four A340-500s and four A340-600s, the airline’s chairman, Sheikh Ahmed Ibn Saif Al-Nahyan, said at a press briefing at the Farnborough Air Show in the U.K. The order extends Airbus’s lead over Chicago-based rival, Boeing Co., which it overtook last year as the world’s largest plane maker. Excluding today, Toulouse, France-based Airbus has secured orders for 104 aircraft this year, while Boeing has orders for 86 planes, including four from yesterday from Emirates of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Middle East carriers such as Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad have been among the biggest drivers of orders during the last three years as they seek to build capacity. As well as wanting to boost international connections with their home base to encourage business and tourist travel, all three seek to use their Persian Gulf location as a hub for more traffic between Europe, the Middle East, and South and East Asia. Etihad Fleet Etihad operates a fleet of six, all but one of which are Airbus. It’s already agreed to lease four more planes, and buy two, all Airbus A330 twin-aisle aircraft. The carrier, which last month carried 50,000 passengers, serves eight destinations, including London, Geneva and Bangkok. It plans to add three more, including the London’s Gatwick Airport and Bombay, before the end of August, according to Kevin Steele, head of sales. From December, it plans to expand it Asian network, adding Delhi, Manila and Kuala Lumpur, Steele said in an interview in Abu Dhabi last week. Abu Dhabi produces about 2 million barrels a day of oil, making it the Middle East’s fourth-largest producer, and has a population of 1.1 million people.

    Response:


  • AGB South Africa?

    Question:

    Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I might be moving… cb

    Response:

    > Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I might be > moving… > cb

    Somebody’s from there…and someone has a wife from there.  I don’t remember whom either one was, but I remember that much because I was in SA last year and I asked before I headed over.  Great country, though. Brent

    Response:

    > Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I might > be > moving… > cb > Somebody’s from there…and someone has a wife from there.  I don’t remember > whom either one was, but I remember that much because I was in SA last year > and I asked before I headed over.  Great country, though.

    Well it’s my wife…. Just did a google search and found some very old posts… The most recent one is from Jake – Still around man? I’ll probably have moved to the Cape by the end of the year and dipping my fingers in and out until then. cb

    Response:

    >>>Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I

    Did ya’ check the map at agb.com? —    O< "Mr. Anderson" /()    ^^                                                      Slidell, LA

    Response:

    > >>>Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I > Did ya’ check the map at agb.com?

    Yup… things have shifted a bit… I got pulled one time too many – and there’s no-one in SA on the maps… cb

    Response:

    I got mistaken for a South African once, I’m an English-educated Canadian.  I still can’t figure that out. Ian

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I might > be > moving… > cb > Somebody’s from there…and someone has a wife from there.  I don’t remember > whom either one was, but I remember that much because I was in SA last year > and I asked before I headed over.  Great country, though. > Brent

    Response:

    Yeah I’m from SA, but living in the UK. Going back sometime relatively soon (probably end next year). Chris.. you lucky bastard! If I had my way I’d be back there already (Cape Town that is!) Three weeks ago I was cruising along the south western side of the Peninsula… during sunset, on my way to Hout Bay. Even took a cool pic while cruising… ARGH gotta go BACK. Cheers Jake

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Just wondering is anyone down in South Africa? Rumour has it that I > might > be > > moving… > > cb > Somebody’s from there…and someone has a wife from there.  I don’t > remember > whom either one was, but I remember that much because I was in SA last > year > and I asked before I headed over.  Great country, though. > Well it’s my wife…. > Just did a google search and found some very old posts… > The most recent one is from Jake – Still around man? > I’ll probably have moved to the Cape by the end of the year and dipping my > fingers in and out until then. > cb

    Response:

    > Yeah I’m from SA, but living in the UK. Going back sometime relatively > soon (probably end next year). > Chris.. you lucky bastard! If I had my way I’d be back there already > (Cape Town that is!) Three weeks ago I was cruising along the south > western side of the Peninsula… during sunset, on my way to Hout Bay. > Even took a cool pic while cruising… ARGH gotta go BACK. > Cheers > Jake

    You what… Moved out? To rip-off Britain? Looks like I’ll be seeing you down there sometime though… cb

    Response:


  • Trips to South Africa

    Question:

    Info on Cape Town Please?

    Response:

    > Info on Cape Town Please?

    What do you want to know about Cape Town? Sorry, but your question is a bit broad (Info on World History please?) <grin>

    Response:

    Info on Cape Town Please?

    Response:

    > Info on Cape Town Please?

    What do you want to know about Cape Town? Sorry, but your question is a bit broad (Info on World History please?) <grin>

    Response:


  • Ray Charles?

    Question:

    Did I hear this correctly? I only caught tail-end of story. John

    Response:

    Just saw it on Yahoo.  RIP – another one of the great ones to go. DonM

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Did I hear this correctly? > I only caught tail-end of story. > John

    Response:

    Ouch. One of the best. John – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Just saw it on Yahoo.  RIP – another one of the great ones to go. > DonM >Did I hear this correctly? >I only caught tail-end of story. >John

    Response:

    >Ouch. >One of the best.

    One of my favorites for sure.  If I could choose anyone to be able to sing like it would by Brother Ray. From the Washington Post: Musician Ray Charles Dies at 73 Grammy Winner Blended Gospel and Blues By Athony Breznican The Associated Press Thursday, June 10, 2004; 4:23 PM BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — Ray Charles, the blind singer and piano player who erased musical boundaries with classic hits such as "What’d I Say," "Hit the Road Jack" and the melancholy ballad "Georgia on My Mind," died Thursday. He was 73. Charles died of acute liver disease at his Beverly Hills home at 11:35 a.m., surrounded by family and friends, said spokesman Jerry Digney. The Grammy winner’s last public appearance was alongside Clint Eastwood on April 30, when the city of Los Angeles designated the singer’s studios, built 40 years ago in central Los Angeles, as a historic landmark. Blind by age 7 and an orphan at 15, Charles spent his life shattering any notion of musical boundaries and defying easy definition. A gifted pianist and saxophonist, he dabbled in country, jazz, big band and blues, and put his stamp on it all with a deep, warm voice roughened by heartbreak from a hardscrabble childhood in the segregated South. "His sound was stunning — it was the blues, it was R&B, it was gospel, it was swing — it was all the stuff I was listening to before that but rolled into one amazing, soulful thing," singer Van Morrison told Rolling Stone magazine in April. Charles won nine of his 12 Grammy Awards between 1960 and 1966, including the best R&B recording three consecutive years ("Hit the Road Jack," "I Can’t Stop Loving You" and "Busted"). His versions of other songs are also well known, including "Makin’ Whoopee" and a stirring "America the Beautiful." Hoagy Carmichael and Stuart Gorrell wrote "Georgia on My Mind" in 1931 but it didn’t become Georgia’s official state song until 1979, long after Charles turned it into an American standard. "I was born with music inside me. That’s the only explanation I know of," Charles said in his 1978 autobiography, "Brother Ray." "Music was one of my parts … Like my blood. It was a force already with me when I arrived on the scene. It was a necessity for me, like food or water." Charles considered Martin Luther King Jr. a friend and once refused to play to segregated audiences in South Africa. But politics didn’t take. He was happiest playing music, smiling and swaying behind the piano as his legs waved in rhythmic joy. His appeal spanned generations: He teamed with such disparate musicians as Willie Nelson, Chaka Khan and Eric Clapton, and appeared in movies including "The Blues Brothers." Pepsi tapped him for TV spots around a simple "uh huh" theme, perhaps playing off the grunts and moans that pepper his songs. "The way I see it, we’re actors, but musical ones," he once told The Associated Press. "We’re doing it with notes, and lyrics with notes, telling a story. I can take an audience and get ‘em into a frenzy so they’ll almost riot, and yet I can sit there so you can almost hear a pin drop." Charles was no angel. He could be mercurial and his womanizing was legendary. He also struggled with a heroin addiction for nearly 20 years before quitting cold turkey in 1965 after an arrest at the Boston airport. Yet there was a sense of humor about even that — he released both "I Don’t Need No Doctor" and "Let’s Go Get Stoned" in 1966. He later became reluctant to talk about the drug use, fearing it would taint how people thought of his work. "I’ve known times where I’ve felt terrible, but once I get to the stage and the band starts with the music, I don’t know why but it’s like you have pain and take an aspirin, and you don’t feel it no more," he once said. Ray Charles Robinson was born Sept. 23, 1930, in Albany, Ga. His father, Bailey Robinson, was a mechanic and a handyman, and his mother, Aretha, stacked boards in a sawmill. His family moved to Gainesville, Fla., when Charles was an infant. "Talk about poor," Charles once said. "We were on the bottom of the ladder." Charles saw his brother drown in the tub his mother used to do laundry when he was about 5 as the family struggled through poverty at the height of the Depression. His sight was gone two years later. Glaucoma is often mentioned as a cause, though Charles said nothing was ever diagnosed. He said his mother never let him wallow in pity. "When the doctors told her that I was gradually losing my sight, and that I wasn’t going to get any better, she started helping me deal with it by showing me how to get around, how to find things," he said in the autobiography. "That made it a little bit easier to deal with." Charles began dabbling in music at 3, encouraged by a cafe owner who played the piano. The knowledge was basic, but he was that much more prepared for music classes when he was sent away, heartbroken, to the state-supported St. Augustine School for the Deaf and the Blind. Charles learned to read and write music in Braille, score for big bands and play instruments — lots of them, including trumpet, clarinet, organ, alto sax and the piano. "Learning to read music in Braille and play by ear helped me develop a damn good memory," Charles said. "I can sit at my desk and write a whole arrangement in my head and never touch the piano. .. There’s no reason for it to come out any different than the way it sounds in my head." His early influences were myriad: Chopin and Sibelius, country and western stars he heard on the Grand Ole Opry, the powerhouse big bands of Duke Ellington and Count Basie, jazz greats Art Tatum and Artie Shaw. By the time he was 15 his parents were dead and Charles had graduated from St. Augustine. He wound up playing gigs in black dance halls — the so-called chitlin’ circuit — and exposed himself to a variety of music, including hillbilly (he learned to yodel) before moving to Seattle. He dropped his last name in deference to boxer Sugar Ray Robinson, patterned himself for a time after Nat "King" Cole and formed a group that backed rhythm ‘n’ blues singer Ruth Brown. It was in Seattle’s red light district were he met a young Quincy Jones, showing the future producer and composer how to write music. It was the beginning of a lifelong friendship. Charles developed quickly in those early days. Atlantic Records purchased his contract from Swingtime Records in 1952, and two years later he recorded "I Got a Woman," a raw mixture of gospel and rhythm ‘n’ blues, inventing what was later called soul. Soon, he was being called "The Genius" and was playing at Carnegie Hall and the Newport Jazz Festival. His first big hit was 1959’s "What’d I Say," a song built off a simple piano riff with suggestive moaning from the Raeletts. Some U.S. radio stations banned the song, but Charles was on his way to stardom. Veteran producer Jerry Wexler, who recorded "What’d I Say," said he has worked with only three geniuses in the music business: Bob Dylan, Aretha Franklin and Charles. "In each case they brought something new to the table," Wexler told the San Jose Mercury News in 1994. Charles "had this blasphemous idea of taking gospel songs and putting the devil’s words to them. … He can take a gem from Tin Pan Alley or cut to the country, but he brings the same root to it, which is black American music." Charles released "Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music, Volumes 1 and 2" in the early ’60s, a big switch from his gospel work. It included "Born to Lose," "Take These Chains From My Heart (And Set Me Free)" and "I Can’t Stop Loving You," some of the biggest hits of his career. He made it a point to explore each medium he took on. Country sides were sometimes pop-oriented, while fiddle, mandolin, banjo and steel guitar were added to "Wish You Were Here Tonight" in the ’80s. Jones even wrote a choral and orchestral work for Charles to perform with the Roanoke, Va., symphony. Charles’ last Grammy came in 1993 for "A Song for You," but he never dropped out of the music scene. He continued to tour and long treasured time for chess. He once told the Los Angeles Times: "I’m not Spassky, but I’ll make it interesting for you." "Music’s been around a long time, and there’s going to be music long after Ray Charles is dead," he told the Washington Post in 1983. "I just want to make my mark, leave something musically good behind. If it’s a big record, that’s the frosting on the cake, but music’s the main meal." Associated Press writer Dave Zelio contributed to this report.


  • Very OT: A fitting memory of RR

    Question:

    "Not long ago, I was invited to be the specter at the feast during "Ronald Reagan Appreciation Week" at Wabash College in Indiana. One of my opponents was Dinesh D’Souza: He wasn’t the only one who maintained that Reagan had been historically vindicated by the wreckage of the Soviet Union. Some of us on the left had also been very glad indeed to see the end of the Russian empire and the Cold War. But nothing could make me forget what the Reagan years had actually been like. Ronald Reagan claimed that the Russian language had no word for "freedom." (The word is "svoboda"; it’s quite well attested in Russian literature.) Ronald Reagan said that intercontinental ballistic missiles (not that there are any non-ballistic missiles